By
Anna Ilona Mussmann
Let’s not fall into the logic of Calvinism when we hear each other praising one thing or another as good. If you are a mom who works outside of the home and your Facebook friend comments that stay-at-home moms give their children a special, irreplaceable gift, don’t jump to the “logical” but incomplete assumption that she is calling you a bad mother for not also giving this particular gift to your children. If you read an article saying it is good to publicly mourn babies who have been miscarried, try not to feel that someone is criticizing your lack of emotion over your own miscarriage or your desire for privacy. If the lady behind you in church (or an author for a blog like ours) likes to talk about the wonderful blessings of homeschooling, don’t take that as a sneaky way of saying you are a reprobate for choosing public school instead.
Maintaining
good dental hygiene. Memorizing the Catechism. Donating blood. Sharing the
Gospel in Africa. Getting married. Creating beautiful art. Being kind to your
next-door neighbor and your daughter-in-law. There are many things in life that
are good.
Yet
there are also many good things which each of us will never do.
Sometimes
it’s because we are too busy fulfilling other duties and obligations. Sometimes
it’s because we are never granted the requisite talents or opportunities.
Sometimes it’s because we are selfish sinners.
How
many good things do we need to get done in this life in order to feel
comfortable about ourselves? As Lutherans, we can recognize that question as a
terrible one. We know that our salvation is a gift, credited to us through the
perfect goodness of the Saviour who died in our place. We are wretched sinners
and yet we are saved. We rejoice in the knowledge that our comfort comes not
from anything we do but from what Christ did.
Yet
despite our blessed understanding of justification through faith, many of us
Lutherans are guilty of falling into a peculiar kind of accidental Calvinism
when it comes to how we feel about the choices that we and our neighbors make.
Calvinists,
you see, are eminently logical. They note that God predestined
certain individuals for salvation. They deduce that God must therefore have
predestined others for damnation. It follows, they believe, that Christ died
only for some sinners. They call it limited atonement.
We
Lutherans stick staunchly to Scripture and refuse to “deduce” things about God
which He clearly did not tell us Himself. Yes, God predestines those who
believe. No, we cannot make up a doctrine that says he also predestines those
who reject faith.
Let’s not fall into the logic of Calvinism when we hear each other praising one thing or another as good. If you are a mom who works outside of the home and your Facebook friend comments that stay-at-home moms give their children a special, irreplaceable gift, don’t jump to the “logical” but incomplete assumption that she is calling you a bad mother for not also giving this particular gift to your children. If you read an article saying it is good to publicly mourn babies who have been miscarried, try not to feel that someone is criticizing your lack of emotion over your own miscarriage or your desire for privacy. If the lady behind you in church (or an author for a blog like ours) likes to talk about the wonderful blessings of homeschooling, don’t take that as a sneaky way of saying you are a reprobate for choosing public school instead.
It’s
hard not to be emotional Calvinists sometimes. There is nothing quite like the
gnawing ache of insecurity. Nothing like the sting of feeling that perhaps we
haven’t done enough or made all the right decisions. Nothing like thinking that
other people are judging us. Don’t I know it!
Yet
goodness is complicated. It intermixes with the brokenness of sin into a
labyrinth of choices and opportunities.
I
believe that what I do as a homemaker is good and valuable. It is worth a
woman’s time--a woman’s life--to [try to] create a place of order, beauty, and
productivity; to care for the needs of others, to teach and train children, and
to help my husband with his work and duties.
Perhaps
your life is different. You aren’t any less of a woman or a Christian if the
good work that is given to you is different from mine. Making sure that your
children have food, clothing, and medical care is a good thing indeed; and
perhaps you cannot provide those things without taking on a night shift or a
day job. Perhaps there are other reasons why the things that are worth your
time, the things that allow you to serve your family or your neighbors, are
different from mine. I hope no matter what you hear me say, you will believe
that I know this.
Acknowledging this isn't relativism. Our choices in life do matter. Yet we are Lutherans, and we can agree that certain choices are usually best--things like letting mothers be the primary caretakers for their small children, pursuing economic models that do not attempt to stifle the differences between the sexes, or practicing hospitality--without necessarily judging those who live in a different way.
We cause a lot of heart burning with our accidental Calvinism. It is so logical! So emotionally compelling! Yet it is heresy, friends. Let’s try not to be heretics.
We cause a lot of heart burning with our accidental Calvinism. It is so logical! So emotionally compelling! Yet it is heresy, friends. Let’s try not to be heretics.
***
After graduating from Concordia Wisconsin, Anna taught in Lutheran schools for several years and became so enthusiastic about Classical Education that she will talk about it to whomever will listen. She is a big fan of Jane Austen, dark chocolate, and the Oxford comma. Anna and her husband live in Pennsylvania with their two small children. Anna's work can also be found in The Federalist.
I know a good group of Reformed people (Calvinists) and yes the double predestination is there, however I never got the sense of them praising one thing meant they were saying another thing was wrong, unless of course the opposite of the thing they were praising was unbiblical. They just saw the good in that thing they were praising. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your article though.
ReplyDeleteI'm not intending to accuse actual theological Calvinists of being more inclined than anyone else to judge the opposite of what they praise. :-) My intention is just to make a point--a kind of analogy--that when we Lutherans do that, we are using the same kind of incomplete logic that gets the Calvinists to limited atonement and double predestination.
DeleteAs you say, our Reformed brothers and sisters are usually lovely people to hang out with.
"Don't I know it!" Oh, don't I know it, too! You make an interesting and good point about the relation between Calvinism and jumping to conclusions.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy your writing a lot. You have deep insights about a wide range of topics from a solidly biblical perspective. That said, this article seems off to me. The point of your article has nothing to do with the very minor differences between Reformed and Lutheran theology. I know your target reader is mainly Lutheran, but surely we ought to seek out unity, not division. For me--and it looks like for the other commenters so far, too--the Calvinist analogy, besides being a broad-stroked caricature of a nuanced theology, was more distracting than helpful. Please take this comment in a kind manner; I couldn't write an essay half as good as your 3rd grade scribblings if my life depended on it.
ReplyDeleteWesley,
DeleteThank you for the kind and encouraging words. I get what you are saying.
I shared this piece because I found the analogy to be helpful to myself when I thought of it. Being able to redirect my thoughts with a catchy phrase--"Hey, emotional Calvinism!"--can keep me from being internally silly. I hope that some readers find the analogy helpful as well.