By Anna Ilona Mussmann
Anna writes as often as she can, although sometimes it is with only one hand because her baby son requires the other. After graduating from Concordia Wisconsin she taught in Lutheran schools for several years and became so enthusiastic about Classical Education that she will talk about it to whomever will listen. She is a big fan of Jane Austen, dark chocolate, and the Oxford comma. Anna and her husband live in Pennsylvania. Anna's personal blog is Don't Forget the Avocados and her work can also be found in The Federalist.
Title Image: "Tea Party" by Louis Moeller (1905)
Good works. Pious living. Helping little old ladies
across the street (you’ve heard the boy scout joke—“It took three of us to get
her across the street.” “Why was that?” “She didn’t want to go”). We Lutherans
are sometimes accused of fleeing from even the mere mention of such things,
lest we be tempted into unrighteous pride or the bondage of the law.
Is it true that Lutherans do a poor job at addressing
Christian living? Is it fair to accuse ourselves of being “weak” in our
teachings on good works? When faced with such a question from our non-Lutheran friends, it is helpful to point to one of the passages in our Lutheran
Confessions that make it clear we hold a Biblical position on good works. For
instance, this one, from the Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord:
“First, there is no controversy among our theologians concerning the following points in this article, namely: that it is God's will, order, and command that believers should walk in good works; and that truly good works are not those which every one contrives himself from a good intention, or which are done according to traditions of men, but those which God Himself has prescribed and commanded in His Word; also, that truly good works are done, not from our own natural powers, but in this way: when the person by faith is reconciled with God and renewed by the Holy Ghost, or, as Paul says, is created anew in Christ Jesus to good works, Eph. 2:10.” (Emphasis mine).
The passage also explains that “although in this flesh
[our good works] are impure and incomplete, [they] are pleasing and acceptable
to God, namely, for the sake of the Lord Christ, by faith, because the person
is acceptable to God.” Lutherans are prudently wary of the human tendency to
notice that a result of a thing is good, and to chase the result
to the neglect of the thing (kind of like trying to use willpower to achieve
the happy, alert feeling that results from a good night’s sleep, instead of
actually lying down and going to sleep). We also know that moralism (an
idolatrous trust in our own goodness instead of in Christ) creeps into human
hearts with serpent-like ease. That awareness makes many Lutherans suspicious
of any conversation on how Christians “should” live.
Our pastors know that the emphasis must remain on
Christ, who took our sins upon Himself “while we were enemies” of
God, as Romans 5:10 says. His death and Resurrection save us. Through the means of Word and
Sacrament, He gives us salvation. The Divine Service is a special, particular,
blessed thing with a special, particular, blessed purpose (to deliver the
forgiving, life-giving, saving benefits of the cross at pulpit, altar, and
font). Our pastors don’t speak much from the pulpit or the altar rail about the
details of how we Christians should train our children, speak to our neighbors,
or write novels that present a Christian worldview. That is not why they
preach. Not everything good, useful, or even Christian belongs up front on
Sunday morning. I cannot help thinking of a time when a non-Lutheran friend
told me that if she met someone who was a brand new convert to Christianity or
who was considering the faith, she would want him to read the Bible on his own
instead of coming to her church. She was afraid that if he heard her pastor’s
sermons, he might conclude that Christianity is about living a moral life. How
blessed we are to attend churches where our pastors preach Law and Gospel every
week!
Yet sometimes we look at the nitty gritty details of our
messy lives and we want to ask questions. Sometimes we are desperately in need
of models, explanations, and instruction on what Christian living actually
looks like. We want to do good, but we aren’t sure what that means. Perhaps our
own parents are divorced, and we have no idea what healthy communication in a
Christian marriage should look like. Perhaps our children don’t want to attend
church, and we need a Lutheran perspective on how to handle it. Sometimes we
need the simple, common-sense kind of advice that used to come from the older
women in the community (see Titus 2:4-5). Often we crave the encouragement of
talking with each other about living in a world that is hostile to our faith.
We are not looking for a law to live by, but encouragement in our desire to
fulfill our vocations.
The need is often especially painful to those of us who
have the job of teaching small children (who would probably prefer to be
antinomians) how to not only behave like civilized, do-gooding citizens who
refrain from walloping their siblings and spitting on their friends, but also
how to make decisions in the sphere of entertainment, love, life, and even sex.
The real problem has nothing to do with a supposed
inadequacy in Sunday morning sermons. It is that in today’s culture, it is hard
to find the Christian community that could, and should, provide us with
appropriate fellowship and mentoring. I suspect that back in the
early-Twentieth Century, when Lutheran churches were packed full of large
families bound together by faith and, in some congregations, a common German
language and culture, this particular challenge was virtually non-existent.
The challenge of our day and age is to consciously,
intentionally build community with those who share our theological
understanding. Grand schemes are nice. Little efforts are more important. When
we make the somewhat counter-cultural move of inviting the single woman who sits
behind us, the family from the front pew, or the new college student
(especially if they are from--gasp--a different generation than ourselves) to
our home, we are taking a step in the right direction. When we seek out families
who do something well and ask them how they get their adorable little hoodlums
to sit so nicely during church, we are taking an even bigger step. When we are
willing to listen respectfully, non-defensively, and openly to the feedback of
the elderly ladies in church (even if it disagrees with our favorite parenting
book), we are practically jumping. Works like Harold Senkbeil’s Sanctification: Christ in Action and Dr. Veith’s God at Work and Family Vocations: God’s Calling in Marriage, Parenthood, and Childhood can
give us helpful guidance in these conversations.
Sometimes fellowship is not, or cannot be, local. I hope
that this blog helps to build Lutheran community. I hope that we can feel that
here we are in safe space where we can assume that we all agree that good works
do not save us; that we are all poor, miserable sinners who require Christ’s
forgiveness every moment of the day; and that sometimes there are practical
tips that help us learn to do a better job at not losing our tempers with the
husbands whom we have promised to love and obey.
The Christian life is full of paradoxes. We worship a God
who is three, yet one; we are saints and yet sinners; we wish to learn to do
good, and yet need to be pointed constantly back to the cross instead of to
ourselves. In this Christian life there is room for talking about how we can
better serve others through our many vocations. The conversations on this site
are not going to help us “reach God’s standards” or achieve a “guaranteed
result” or any kind of delusional nonsense like that. That ain’t happening as
long as we are human sinners. However, I think that they are helpful and
appropriate when they are part of a life of constant repentance and trust in
God’s grace.
***
Anna writes as often as she can, although sometimes it is with only one hand because her baby son requires the other. After graduating from Concordia Wisconsin she taught in Lutheran schools for several years and became so enthusiastic about Classical Education that she will talk about it to whomever will listen. She is a big fan of Jane Austen, dark chocolate, and the Oxford comma. Anna and her husband live in Pennsylvania. Anna's personal blog is Don't Forget the Avocados and her work can also be found in The Federalist.
Title Image: "Tea Party" by Louis Moeller (1905)
This is a really great article. I have spent a lot of time pondering this very same topic as a mother with many young children. I crave specific advice for the day to day struggles I face, but I need it from a Lutheran perspective.
ReplyDeleteI'm fortunate in having Lutheran relatives (mother and mother-in-law) who can give me advice, but I know a lot of people don't have that. Maybe we need an "adopt a family" program for older Lutherans willing to be honorary grandparents.
DeleteI apologize, I just commented as anonymous without signing off.
ReplyDelete~Brandy
Well said, Anna! I am so very thankful to have found this community of women as I fumble through my earthly vocations.
ReplyDeleteMe too!
DeleteYes. I have looked at so many books that promise great advice, but only end up telling me that I need to do something like train my child's heart properly. What!? What does that even mean? What does that look like, and how does it help me get the floor mopped or teach the children how to tie their shoes? Most importantly, how does it point me back to the cross?
ReplyDeleteYeah, the whole "train a child's heart" thing is tricky, because we do have the job of "being the law" to them, but also the job of teaching them the Gospel. Figuring out how to apply the sensible parts of evangelical parenting materials, while also being Lutheran, is not always easy!
Delete