By Allison Kieselowsky
No matter how you slice, dice, or parse it, the words, “I
asked Jesus into my heart,” do not express the same thing as, “Jesus Christ . .
. has redeemed me, a lost and condemned person.”
Last fall, Stanford researchers published their findings
after a study of 18-month-old children in families of both low and high
socioeconomic status (SES). They found
that children’s language processing speeds in low SES families begin slower
than children in higher SES and that this gap grows as the children age, which
impacts academic achievement throughout the children’s school years. Read the article HERE.
At the end of the article, the head researcher, Anne
Fernald, a Stanford associate professor of psychology, concludes, “The good
news is that regardless of economic circumstances, parents who use more and
richer language with their infants can help their child to learn more
quickly.” It’s no surprise that the
issue here is less about family income and more about familial stability (or
lack thereof) and language interactions between adults and children. Children who hear supportive, rich language
throughout the day will comprehend language more fully and will process
language more quickly.
I know many families who conscientiously speak complete
sentences to infants and toddlers, who read books to their children, and who
strive to temper discipline or correction of children with words of love and
encouragement. I wonder, though, if even
in families with rich language experiences, a dearth of rich biblical
conversation and instruction has created a similar language gap in terms of
understanding God’s Word. If our
children do not regularly hear rich theological language that forces them to
struggle with their souls, we are creating ears that are slow to learn and
process the teaching of Holy Scripture.
Consider what I was taught as a four-year-old growing up
in a non-denominational church. I learned that I did bad things which made me a
sinner; Jesus died in my place and took the punishment I deserved; I needed to
accept Jesus into my heart to be forgiven for my sins. On the surface, that may seem like an
age-appropriate explanation of some basic Christian teachings. It seemed satisfactory until I began to
memorize Luther’s Small Catechism with my daughters. In contrast to what I learned, Luther recommended
this explanation for small children: “I believe that Jesus Christ, true God,
begotten of the Father from all eternity, and also true man, born of the Virgin
Mary, is my Lord, who has redeemed me, a lost and condemned person, purchased
and won me from all sins, from death, and from the power of the devil; not with
gold or silver, but with His holy, precious blood and with His innocent
suffering and death.”
Luther packed a lot of punch; he filled his catechism
with rich teaching into relatively short statements. Do we believe that even the youngest children
should hear the richest expression of our faith as found in the catechism and
creeds? Yes. Emphatically, yes.
The Church has given us a wonderful gift in Luther’s
catechism as it provides children and adults alike the structure and language
of redemption as taught in the Holy Scriptures, just as it offers beautiful
language of prayer. My parents did
instruct me to pray before heading to school, before meals, and before bed, but
the spontaneous prayers of my childhood invariably fell into the same simplistic
pattern: thank you for [the food] and
pray for [so-and-so]. Again, does this
formula require our children to think and to develop depth in their
understanding of prayer? Does it express our faith in the richest and fullest
language?
Our guide should be the Lord’s Prayer, which in turn
framed Luther’s evening prayer: “I thank
you, my heavenly Father, that You have graciously kept me this day. And I pray that You would forgive me all of
my sins, where I have done wrong, and graciously keep me this night. For into Your hands I commend myself, my body
and soul. Let Your holy angel be with me
that the evil foe may have no power over me. AMEN.” Instead of simplistic prayers that children
will discard as they mature, we have prayers that will allow the children to
develop in their understanding over time, prayers that give them language to
deal with the temptations, sins, and sorrows of this life.
Since the Stanford study was released, I have read other
articles about teachers, pediatricians, social workers, and parents across the
country reacting to this most recent research by encouraging low-SES families
to create language-rich environments for the children in the community by using
electronic devices to count words spoken to a child during the course of the
day. The data is used to teach
caregivers how to incorporate songs and conversation into common events such as
baths and diaper changes.
I admit that I’ve been tempted to strap a recording
device to my 10-month-old baby so I could chart out the number of words I speak
or sing to her and then break that number down into secular and sacred words,
but that’s probably a little extreme. I
do know without recordings and charts that I’ve gotten much more comfortable
with engaging my daughters in theologically rich conversation as I
practice.
When my oldest daughter was born, I stared at her with no
small amount of trepidation. I had no
idea what to do with a baby except the basic feeding, cleaning, and
dressing. So I started reading books to her
and praying the Lord’s Prayer and Luther’s Evening Prayer with her every
day. That’s it—nothing novel or
innovative. But it turns out that my
unimaginative beginning was precisely the nurturing my girls needed. According to research, they will have heard
millions of words fall from my lips by the time they are three years old. That’s a lot of words.
I wonder if Luther minds that I stole many of those words
from him.
***
Allison Kieselowsky lives in Springfield, PA, with her husband Rob and their four daughters. She has been a daughter and sister for nearly forty years, a wife for nearly fourteen years, an English teacher and reading specialist for nearly ten years, and a mother for nearly seven years. She currently works at home as the general manager of household affairs, short-order cook, laundress, and teacher.
Image: "The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit" by John Singer Sargent, 1882
Allison, Thanks so much for writing this! Since reading it, I've found myself thinking about the songs and chants that I use with my little guy, and trying to figure out how to incorporate more sacred language instead of just sticking with, "She'll be comin' round the mountain."
ReplyDeletemore about the language of luther…: http://ergofabulous.org/luther/
ReplyDeleteI sang Jesus Loves Me to my baby daughter. When she was only about 3, someone at church who had heard her sing it asked if she could sing it during a worship service. They walked her to the front and held a microphone to let her share the beautiful song — a day I will never forget. Thanks for writing this post. It is never too early to share the Word with children. They participate in worship even in the womb.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely love this article! So very true. We periodically introduce new bedtime songs to our children (usually hymn verses), and the latest one is the Phos Hilaron, or "Hymn of Light" from Evening Prayer. My five-year old can sing it all by herself- "Joyous light of glory of the immortal Father, heavenly, holy, blessed Jesus Christ..." It's amazing to see how quickly children pick up on the rich vocabulary of hymns, prayers, and catechism explanations. And you're absolutely right- the sooner they are introduced to this language the more they will be able to speak it themselves as they grow and mature. Thank you for the beautiful reminder!
ReplyDelete