By Anna Ilona Mussmann
Yet when a Lutheran woman is offered a shiny little diamond
by a man who likes her a lot, she is suddenly forced to realize how different
her understanding of Christian decision-making is from that of the world around
her. Both the evangelicals and the secularists of our culture treat the “marriage
decision” with mysticism. Despite (or because of) rampant divorce, we often
treat marriage as some kind of civil holy rite, as a mythological meeting of “soulmates,”
as if the key to a happy marriage is somehow having the incredible luck to find
the one true person (out of the billions on this planet) for oneself. We
construct odd systems of morality in which only passionate emotions are a
respectable reason for marriage. Marriage is often treated as a fluffy, pink,
emotional yet eternal decision that is like no other.
When the responsibility for choosing a life-partner rests on one’s shoulders, the weight can be a little unnerving. To misquote J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan, “Forever is an awfully long time.” There may be some women who walk on clouds from the moment of the proposal, filled with blissful confidence that their true prince has found them, but most of us are earthier creatures with a bit of mud on our shoes. We are down here among the begonias where we can see our beloved’s flaws. At times, we wonder if this is the right path to take, and whether he is really the right man for forever. And the minute that one wonders such things, one can’t help wondering if the fact of wondering proves that one should be further wondering (ahem) if wondering is a bad sign.
Title Image: "Proposal" by John Pettie
One of my eight-year-old students once asked me why I
wasn’t married. “All you have to do,” she explained, “is to find a man who
likes you a lot and be really nice to him.” The funny thing is that during that
same school year, a long-time (male) family friend began calling me on the
phone to chat. Apparently I was suitably nice to him, because by spring break
he proposed. I said yes. We picked out a lovely ring. By the end of the summer,
we were married (since then we have advised marriage to everyone we know, if they
can possibly manage it—marriage is awesome).
If I had been an evangelical, I might have waited to
accept the ring until I felt that God was directly telling me to do so. If I
were a mainstream secularist, I might have taken the ring and figured that I
could always back out later if my prince grew clay feet. The tough thing about
being Lutheran is that you believe marriage is till-death-us-do-part and yet
you don’t think that you can count on God to pick out your spouse for you. Instead, you realize that God has given you the
freedom to use the wits he provides, to pray, to seek wise advice, and then (by
His grace) to stand by whatever decision you make.
When the responsibility for choosing a life-partner rests on one’s shoulders, the weight can be a little unnerving. To misquote J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan, “Forever is an awfully long time.” There may be some women who walk on clouds from the moment of the proposal, filled with blissful confidence that their true prince has found them, but most of us are earthier creatures with a bit of mud on our shoes. We are down here among the begonias where we can see our beloved’s flaws. At times, we wonder if this is the right path to take, and whether he is really the right man for forever. And the minute that one wonders such things, one can’t help wondering if the fact of wondering proves that one should be further wondering (ahem) if wondering is a bad sign.
I think that the popular concept of marriage is quite
paralyzing, because how can one ever truly know that one has found the
absolutely perfect person? What if one marries the wrong one? What if one’s
soulmate actually lives in Siberia? In contrast, thinking of marriage as a big
but ordinary decision helped calm my fiancé and me down. We spent a lot of time
talking about decision making. We realized that for us, the key was to be
self-aware. We needed to know if we were merely suffering nerves, or really beset
by doubts. We agreed that nerves are inevitable to any big decision, but that
doubts should be treated as speed bumps and maybe even “no entrance” signs. We
found the following questions very useful.
Am I nervous about marriage because it is a big
commitment, or am I nervous about marrying this
person?
Both of us felt that the commitment of marriage itself
was so big, so exciting, and so all-encompassing that it made our decision
solemn and a little bit terrifying. Yet we were not worried about marrying each
other. I trusted my fiancé. I knew that he would do his best. I knew that we
would both work through our future conflicts instead of avoiding them.
When I make other big decisions in my life, do I feel
jitters about those, too, or am I usually confident about my choices?
We both agreed that we tend to stress over decisions and
to experience moments of self-doubt (“should I really move cross-country /
major in this subject / buy the blue sweater instead of the red one?”). For our
personalities, moments of nervous self-examination are par for the course, and thus
not a red flag of warning. If we had experienced far more uneasiness than was
usual for other decisions, we would have been more worried. Knowing ourselves
helped us to ask the right questions and to reject the wrong ones. For
instance, it is often said that you should never marry someone until you’ve had
a few fights with him, so that you can see if the two of you have compatible
methods of handling disagreement. My fiancé and I never had a fight, a quarrel,
or even an argument. We laughed about the possibility of staging a conflict
just for the sake of resolving it, but that didn’t seem like playing by the
rules. The thing is, though, neither of us has even mildly combative
personalities, and we share so many beliefs that any fights would have been
about such trivial things that it would have been hard to muster any anger or
fighting stamina. Because of our long, pre-romance history together, we knew
that our mutual amiability was genuine and not just the result of romantic
attraction. We knew ourselves well enough to focus on talking extensively and
building good communication patterns instead of prolonging our engagement until
we could muster up a good fight.
Since the days of my engagement, I have been asked
whether it is normal to suffer from nerves before one’s wedding. It is. In fact, marriage is so large a
thing that it would be a bad sign not to feel any uneasiness at the prospect of
trying it. The degree of concern that a prospective bride should feel varies with
her personality. Too much might indicate that something really is wrong with
her decision. Too much might suggest that she is trying to ignore problems in
her man simply because she wants the white dress, the married life, or other
blessings of marriage. It is important for every bride, but perhaps especially
us Lutherans, to honestly examine ourselves before marriage as we decide
whether or not to accept a proffered ring.
Marriage really is an awesome gift of God, and I
encourage others to seek it out. It is worth all the stress of such a decision.
Being Lutheran may make saying “yes” harder in one way, but it also makes it
easier. Instead of asking myself whether my fiancé was the prince who would
serve and make me happy forever, whether he was my soulmate come to me on a
fluffy pink cloud, I could ask something different. I could ask whether I was
ready to enter into the vocation of trying to help and care for him. I could
ask whether I was willing to commit to that vocation until death parts us. This
question is liberating. I cannot control what he is or what he does, but I can
ask God for the strength to be and do what I ought. I will need daily
forgiveness when I fail, but what’s new about that? God may not have promised
to tell us whom to marry, but He does promise to hear our prayers and to work
through our weakness. He blesses the gift of marriage and he doesn’t require
pink clouds to do so.
P.S. My husband found this cartoon on the subject rather amusing (note: earthy language). No, it doesn't symbolize his feelings on the day of our wedding!
***
Anna writes as often as she can, although sometimes it is
with only one hand because her baby son requires the other. After graduating
from Concordia Wisconsin she taught in Lutheran schools for several years and
became so enthusiastic about Classical Education that she will talk about it to
whomever will listen. She is a big fan of Jane Austen, dark chocolate, and the
Oxford comma. Anna and her husband live in Pennsylvania. Anna's personal blog
is Don't Forget the Avocados.
Title Image: "Proposal" by John Pettie
Excellent!! Thank you for sharing!
ReplyDeleteLovely! I will be passing this along.
ReplyDeleteLovely! I will be sharing.
ReplyDeleteHamlette (https://www.blogger.com/profile/11961916847426233995) posted this comment, and I inadvertently deleted it by pressing the wrong thing on my phone. I am copy/pasting here.
ReplyDelete"When I was contemplating marriage, and those "is this the right person?" thoughts were running through my head, oddly enough, a line from the movie version of Emma (1996) helped me put things in perspective. Emma Woodhouse asked her friend Harriet Smith if she thought Robert Martin was the most agreeable man she had ever met or would ever meet. And I always found that to be so ridiculous -- how do you know you won't ever meet someone more agreeable? But does that mean you can never marry anyone at all, because some day you might find someone nicer? What nonsense!"